Keefektifan pendidikan anti-bullying terhadap pengetahuan, sikap, dan self-efficacy pada guru di Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Bayu Seto Rindi Atmojo Program Studi Keperawatan Akademi Keperawatan Pemkab Purworejo, Indonesia
  • Imam Permana Program Studi Magister Keperawatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32504/hspj.v4i2.256

Keywords:

Anti-bullying education, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy

Abstract

Cases of bullying in schools have become a widespread phenomenon and have a negative impact on the school atmosphere. A good and fearless learning environment needs attention. Educational institutions have the task of creating and guaranteeing a conducive and safe learning atmosphere so that students feel happy and comfortable while at school. This can be supported by teachers who have good knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy towards bullying cases. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of anti-bullying education on teacher's knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. The method used in this study uses a pre-experimental quantitative approach with a one-group pretest-posttest design. The population in this study were all teachers of SMP 11 Yogyakarta, the sampling technique used total sampling, so the sample was 23 teachers. Test data analysis used the Wilcoxon test. Knowledge prior to the intervention of the average respondent was given in the good category, good enough attitude and self-efficacy in the poor category. Knowledge after being given an intervention is mostly in the good category, good attitude and good self-efficacy. Wilcoxon test results on each variable of knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy obtained p value 0,002, which means that anti-bullying education affects the knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy of teachers. It can be concluded that anti-bullying education is effective in increasing teacher’s knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy in SMP 11 Yogyakarta

References

Ningrum AW, Christiana E, Nursalim M, Lukitaningsih R. Studi Tentang Perilaku Bullying Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Se-Kecamatan Prajurit Kulon Kota Mojokerto Serta Penanganan Oleh Guru BK. J UNESA. 2016;

Ayu Lestari D, Yusmansyah, Eka Andriyanto R. Analisis Perilaku Bullying Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 15 Bandar Lampung The Analysis of Students Bullying Behavior of SMA 15 Bandar Lampung. Univ Lampung. 2019; Maret.

UNICEF. Laporan Tahunan Indonesia 2015. Jakarta; 2016.

KPAI. KPAI Terima Aduan 26 Ribu Kasus Bully Selama 2011-2017. 2017.

Octavianto M. Perilaku Bullying di Sekolah Menengah Atas Kota Yogyakarta. J Ris Mhs Bimbing dan Konseling,. 2017;3(8):376-385.

Putri HN, Nauli FA, Novayelinda R. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Bullying Pada Remaja. JOM. 2015;2(37):1–31.

Zakiya, Maiza. Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. J Obs J Pendidik Anak Usia Dini. 2019;3(2):356.

Wakhid A, Andriani NS, Saparwati M. Perilaku Bullying Siswa Usia 10-12 Tahun. J Keperawatan Jiwa. 2019;5(1):25.

Yandri H. Peran Guru BK/Konselor Dalam Pencegahan Tindakan Bullying Di Sekolah. J Pelangi. 2014;7(1):97–107.

Subianto J. Peran Keluarga, Sekolah, Dan Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Karakter Berkualitas. Edukasia J Penelit Pendidik Islam. 2013;8(2):331–54.

Mandiri JA. Peran Guru Dalam Mengatasi Perilaku Bullying Pada Siswa Kelas Atas Di SD Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta. Univ Nusant PGRI Kediri [Internet]. 2017;01:1–7. Available from: http://www.albayan.ae

Sitasari NW. Persepsi Tentang Perilaku Bullying Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin. J Psikol. 2017; 15(2):40.

Ulya Z. Efektivitas Pelatihan “Care Teacher, Fight Bullying†untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pembinaan Bullying pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Anal J Magister Psikol UMA. 2019;11(2):144.

Chen L, Sung Y, Cheng W. How to Enhance Teachers’ Bullying Identification: A Comparison Among Providing A Training Program, A Written Definition, And A Definition with A Checklist Of Bullying Characteristics. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2017;26(6):351–9.

Gibson, S., & Dembo MH. Teacher efficacy: A construct valida tion. J Educ Psychol. 1984; 76(4):569–82.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check